Fantasy Draft IX - Official Chit Chat

[PFH]

Intention has nothing to do with the result you created. It doesnt matter what you intended. It looked targetted and very bias. Not very giggly there argonaut.

I doubt everyone will get nuked. Even so, wouldnt change how i feel lmao

Instead of double posting, edit your comment. Everyone is capable of that.

If dez and mel were guiding you as you say, you wouldnt be obtaining emails as a mod and making jokes out of obtaining private information as such.

[Argo]

I like my draft team. We are pretty strong. Some wise old fatcat pirates and battle-field great, Banger - how can you lose?

I do think Seas and Avery are strong contenders.. but it will come down to the blurb.

Some great crew there. All the teams are really good .. What's your thoughts? Will you continue the descriptions you started? That'd be good.

[Argo]

lmao
Just saw your edit..

f dez and mel were guiding you as you say, you wouldnt be obtaining emails as a mod and making jokes out of obtaining private information as such.

What does that mean? JOKES OUT OF OBTAIINING PRIVATE INFORMATION" ? wtf is that you are on about now?

[PFH]

lmao
Just saw your edit..

f dez and mel were guiding you as you say, you wouldnt be obtaining emails as a mod and making jokes out of obtaining private information as such.

What does that mean? JOKES OUT OF OBTAIINING PRIVATE INFORMATION" ? wtf is that you are on about now?

Your commentary you make on social platforms doesnt go unnoticed. Mind what you say

[Argo]

Thanks for reminding me I am a mod.

*Puts on mod hat...

Warning: Mod baiting anyone?
And dont try and be cryptic .. if you want to point something out, dont dance and coward foot around with random disconnected comments ..

[Lil Lola]

I am curious : was due diligence performed on all picks to ensure the 'inactives' (however defined) were weeded out?

You see, I have been informed that one notable pick has not logged in for over 30 days.

So....

Wait who?????????? And if so!!! I say we should demand a restart!!!!!!!

[Argo]

I am curious : was due diligence performed on all picks to ensure the 'inactives' (however defined) were weeded out?

You see, I have been informed that one notable pick has not logged in for over 30 days.

So....

Wait who?????????? And if so!!! I say we should demand a restart!!!!!!!

Ive double-checked it. It is not an issue.

[Most Lee Harmless]

Well.. if due diligence was performed then the player would be known to those enforcing the rule. Unless that diligence was only applied randomly or in a less than even-handed manner : which is just speculation.

Who? Doesn't really matter now as the draft is closed and the teams selected. I blame the rules : bad enough they were poorly considered but to then have them applied in such an inconsistent manner does not make for a good look.

It would seem that the player mentioned did log on within the previous 14 days and posted a comment in the tavern. Given another player was ruled out having logged on less than seven days previously is where the inconsistancy lies.

[Lil Lola]

So this player logged in a posted on the forums. Which is visibility the Dez was asking for but I think unfortunately for Sebena, Dez would just have to take your word for it that he logged in and did stuff but not apparent to everyone else. And it seems that your word isn’t good enough? Although maybe logging in is something we really aren’t supposed to discuss in forums? Well I do know traders usually don’t like talking about it. I couldn’t careless. HN me not like it hasnt already been done before.

[Argo]

Well.. if due diligence was performed then the player would be known to those enforcing the rule. Unless that diligence was only applied randomly or in a less than even-handed manner : which is just speculation.

Who? Doesn't really matter now as the draft is closed and the teams selected. I blame the rules : bad enough they were poorly considered but to then have them applied in such an inconsistent manner does not make for a good look.

It would seem that the player mentioned did log on within the previous 14 days and posted a comment in the tavern. Given another player was ruled out having logged on less than seven days previously is where the inconsistancy lies.

Well we can learn from this draft too as we go ..
Next guidelines for an event need to be given wider consideration clearly defining all possibilities?
Altho .. I imagine, even then , there will be something we don't cover that continues to bring the theatre spectacular!!