Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

General chit-chat about anything in-game here.
In-game trade offers should be published here
Roleplaying is recommended (Write like as if your character is speaking)

Re: Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

Postby DezNutz » Thu May 03, 2018 5:29 pm

Or a butt pirate.
I'm only here for Game Development and Forum Moderation.

If you see a forum rule violation, report the post.
User avatar
DezNutz
Players Dev Team Coordinator
 
Posts: 7081
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:51 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

Postby OG Deadking » Thu May 03, 2018 5:49 pm

Sebastian Michaelis wrote:It wasn't a complete compensation which i understood. So i did :D


So you raided/attacked someone, they retailated, and you ask for compensation for the damage that you took that they dished out even though you started it?

No offense but if your going to do that you might as well just ask for some money or not have attempted the raid whatsoever.
very optimistic person, and very complex person
User avatar
OG Deadking
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:44 pm
Location: clinton, Mississippi, U.S.A

Re: Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

Postby PFH » Thu May 03, 2018 5:57 pm

It was the “lit your hit” principle in which if someone is already on the boards for their actions, it is expected to get hit by other stronger fleets. However i did instigate the retal as i only targetted phoenix for my mission.

I normally wouldnt care if i was the caster or if it was a single levi or such. The compensation was from the cc burns and the levi of my mow 5 times and an attempted 15 or so. Ambushes as well against the fleet also were in effect but that didnt bother me. It was only the excessive destruction of the mow that got my attention.
If it was levied 1 time that would have balanced out the plunder gains from the losses of phoenix. Im not complaining as the problem was fixed but i am just pointing out the reason i seeked a sort of compensation. It wasnt full comp as im still shortened of attributes but that can be fixed through investments and income.
Evil Teddy Bear :P
User avatar
PFH
 
Posts: 3249
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:48 pm

Re: Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

Postby OG Deadking » Thu May 03, 2018 6:02 pm

Sebastian Michaelis wrote:It was the “lit your hit” principle in which if someone is already on the boards for their actions, it is expected to get hit by other stronger fleets. However i did instigate the retal as i only targetted phoenix for my mission.

I normally wouldnt care if i was the caster or if it was a single levi or such. The compensation was from the cc burns and the levi of my mow 5 times and an attempted 15 or so. Ambushes as well against the fleet also were in effect but that didnt bother me. It was only the excessive destruction of the mow that got my attention.
If it was levied 1 time that would have balanced out the plunder gains from the losses of phoenix. Im not complaining as the problem was fixed but i am just pointing out the reason i seeked a sort of compensation. It wasnt full comp as im still shortened of attributes but that can be fixed through investments and income.

oh alright thats fair
very optimistic person, and very complex person
User avatar
OG Deadking
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:44 pm
Location: clinton, Mississippi, U.S.A

Re: Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

Postby sXs » Thu May 03, 2018 7:01 pm

OG Deadking wrote:Welp, all you pirates and pirate sympathizers have good luck with that.

Also change the name of this game from pirates glory to traders glory, because right now piracy is pretty much going to be dead.

No pirate going to take that guild down.


Don't need to "take that guild down". Just like all other aspects, weigh risk v reward. It is a matter of profit.

It was nice of them to put most of the large traders all in one guild though. :D :arr :duel
User avatar
sXs
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2017 6:17 pm

Re: Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

Postby PhoenixKnight » Thu May 03, 2018 7:19 pm

We just got together to watch each other’s backs. You can resume piracy as you please. We are not restricting anyone.
Phoenix Knight
Dragon of the desert and the two seas
User avatar
PhoenixKnight
 
Posts: 1318
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 9:27 pm

Re: Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

Postby PhoenixKnight » Thu May 03, 2018 7:21 pm

Sebastian Michaelis wrote:It was the “lit your hit” principle in which if someone is already on the boards for their actions, it is expected to get hit by other stronger fleets. However i did instigate the retal as i only targetted phoenix for my mission.

I normally wouldnt care if i was the caster or if it was a single levi or such. The compensation was from the cc burns and the levi of my mow 5 times and an attempted 15 or so. Ambushes as well against the fleet also were in effect but that didnt bother me. It was only the excessive destruction of the mow that got my attention.
If it was levied 1 time that would have balanced out the plunder gains from the losses of phoenix. Im not complaining as the problem was fixed but i am just pointing out the reason i seeked a sort of compensation. It wasnt full comp as im still shortened of attributes but that can be fixed through investments and income.



Well, I did want to steal that MOW before Shadowood. Since I didn’t have enough booty masters, I decided it is only fair to compensate you for the damages minus my own losses of course
Phoenix Knight
Dragon of the desert and the two seas
User avatar
PhoenixKnight
 
Posts: 1318
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 9:27 pm

Re: Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

Postby Shadowood » Thu May 03, 2018 7:40 pm

Did someone say Man of War!! :pirateflag
I don't fear death. I look forward to it with great anticipation. For then I will met God face to face and let him know that I stole his Man of War!!!
User avatar
Shadowood
Fantasy Draft Deity
 
Posts: 4080
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 5:40 am

Re: Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

Postby OG Deadking » Thu May 03, 2018 7:45 pm

Shadowood wrote:Did someone say Man of War!! :pirateflag


You love you man of wars don't you?

Since your a trader now how about a little comp for that MoW and two sotls you stole/sunk from me a while back

:) :D
very optimistic person, and very complex person
User avatar
OG Deadking
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:44 pm
Location: clinton, Mississippi, U.S.A

Re: Traders Union Defense of Realm mean ending of piracy?

Postby DezNutz » Thu May 03, 2018 7:50 pm

PhoenixKnight wrote:
Sebastian Michaelis wrote:It was the “lit your hit” principle in which if someone is already on the boards for their actions, it is expected to get hit by other stronger fleets. However i did instigate the retal as i only targetted phoenix for my mission.

I normally wouldnt care if i was the caster or if it was a single levi or such. The compensation was from the cc burns and the levi of my mow 5 times and an attempted 15 or so. Ambushes as well against the fleet also were in effect but that didnt bother me. It was only the excessive destruction of the mow that got my attention.
If it was levied 1 time that would have balanced out the plunder gains from the losses of phoenix. Im not complaining as the problem was fixed but i am just pointing out the reason i seeked a sort of compensation. It wasnt full comp as im still shortened of attributes but that can be fixed through investments and income.



Well, I did want to steal that MOW before Shadowood. Since I didn’t have enough booty masters, I decided it is only fair to compensate you for the damages minus my own losses of course


You are way too nice PHX.
I'm only here for Game Development and Forum Moderation.

If you see a forum rule violation, report the post.
User avatar
DezNutz
Players Dev Team Coordinator
 
Posts: 7081
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:51 pm
Location: United States of America

PreviousNext

Return to Tavern